Think about the Transformers movies. They are grand spectacles that are highly entertaining visually. We don't see these films because of the depth of the plot, the characters, or even the themes it addresses (though the first one could be analyzed for how it conveys an enduring understanding about the relationship between a teenage boy and his car). We see these films because it is "cool" to see how the Transformers transform back and forth from a robot to a vehicle and because the visuals are like the art of a comic book panel coming to life. The films are successful because they are dazzling.
The Transformers movies are also highly criticized for being empty and lacking any deeper meaning. They are pure spectacle, which Aristotle defines in his Poetics to be the least important component of a dramatic tragedy, focusing on the sensory effects: costumes, scenery, the gestures of the actors, the sound of the music and the resonance of the actors' voices. The substance of a drama is its plot, the "representation of human action" and one of the objects of the performance along with character (defining who the character or individual is) and thought (how the individual makes their decisions). In essence, Aristotle believes tragedy is effective when it focuses more on substance than spectacle.
Can't the same be said about project-based learning?
Project-based learning is one of the most creative best practices, instructional methods, and active learning strategies we educators can use to challenge and engage our students to demonstrate and communicate their deeper knowledge, understanding, thinking, and awareness about the concepts and content they are learning. It also supports education and performance in areas that are not considered (but should) to be the "core academic courses" - the fine and visual arts, career and technical education, and physical education.
|Problem-Based Learning (PBL)|
How many classrooms and schools have we been in where the walls are decorated with the artistic works of the kids? How many thematic nights have been presented by the school in which the library or cafeteria is turned into a museum featuring the dioramas and models designed by the students? How many classroom performances have we been to where the students gave dramatic interpretations and presentations of what they are learning?
We've even used project-based learning as a means of addressing the cuts made to the arts, career and technical education, and physical education in which the delivery of instruction is project-based learning.
Project-based learning is highly creative and promotes creativity. However, does it foster and prompt creative thinking?
|5 R's of Problem-Based Learning|
|What Is Creative Thinking?|
Creativity is the medium, manner, or mode in which creative thinking is expressed. This is what the projects are. Each project a student produces represents the individual perspective and thought process of the person who designed the project - how they interpret the information, see the world, and share their vision. This is why each project designed is unique to its designer or developer. No project will typically be the same unless the student is expected to follow a set list of directions to produce a final product that has been already been defined and determined (for example, building IKEA furniture). That's not a project. That's a task.
The problem with project-based learning is that we focus more on the output or result than the process - or, in other words, we care more about what the student produces than the extent the student needed to research and investigate the necessary data, details, elements, facts, and information they needed to develop the project; the manner in which they designed the project; and the intended message of their project. Instead, we typically judge a project based upon its aesthetics - how does it look and how well did the student meet the expectations for the task.
This is what I mean by Transformer Education: Project-Based Learning in Disguise. Like the Transformers, we're focused more on the spectacle or presentation of the project than the level of thinking the student demonstrated and depth of knowledge the student communicated in designing the project. The project highly entertaining, appealing, and interesting, but it lacks substance - like a Transformers movie.
Such project-based learning is merely "educational arts and crafts", an extension of what Calkins (1998) and Schmoker (2007) notion of "literary arts and crafts" that simply have students making "stuff" in the name of creativity and creative expression. While I do not agree with Schmoker's notion that such learning is not purposeful, I do echo his sentiments that the creative expression provided through project-based learning that has students demonstrating their ability to create and communicate their depth of knowledge, understanding, and awareness of their knowledge and thinking must be more insightful and intellectual.
Another problem with project-based learning is that we often assign students the same project to do. We have all students create a diorama, a model, a poster, a performance on the same concept, idea, subject, or topic. Every student in class designs some kind of artistic representation of the solar system. Every student writes a short story in the genre being studied in class. Every student writes the same report. Every student creates the same model of the atom. Again, this focuses more on the output, production, and result than the thought process behind its design.
Critiquing project based upon their quality rather than depth also can cause conflict. How many incidences have you experienced or heard about in which the parent confronted the teacher upset by the grade their student received on a project? How many times have you found yourself questioning who truly designed the project - the student or the parent? How many times have you encountered a situation in which the student addresses all the criteria of the project but the final product they turn in is a mess? How many situations have you had in which the project becomes too overwhelming for the student or the project does not work properly on the day it is presented? What do you do in those situations?
Project-based learning should not only be about the final product but the process in which the project is designed. The emphasis should not be about how spectacular the project looks but rather how substantial are the concepts, ideas, subjects, and topics the final product addresses. The evaluation should be not on the project itself but the level of thinking and depth of knowledge students expressed in their design, invention, plan, or production.
|Why Is She Smiling?|
The projects did not have to be grand scale models, visual presentations, or performances. I informed my students that a project what a product that demonstrated and communicated their depth of knowledge, understanding, thinking, and awareness of what they have learned. It could be a research paper, a report, or a personal narrative.
The projects were long term projects that generally took the entire scope of the unit to complete, which was about four to six weeks. The last week of the unit was devoted to project presentations. Each student was expected to present their project. If it was a project that needed to be experienced by an audience, it was presented to the class. If it was a research paper or report, it was discussed in a Socratic seminar that the student who wrote the paper and I would facilitate.
I would grade the research and process papers the students submitted along with their project. Then I'd let the students in the class grade the projects.
As I'm certain it is for many of you, I find it difficult to grade a student based upon the quality of a project - especially the more artistic it is. There are some students who simply struggle with the ability to draw, to build a model, to sing, to act, to dance to stand up before a large crowd and perform or speak, or even to work with others in a group. Perhaps that's not their area of strength, skill, or talent. What am I doing by forcing them to do a project that may push them out of their level of comfort but backfires by asking them to do something they simply cannot do for whatever reason?
I also found it very boring and dull for me to grade the same project. It became more tedious and time consuming for me to grade the project than probably for my students to do the project. I also struggled with what exactly was I grading - the substance or the spectacle of the project? Was I truly grading them based upon their deeper knowledge, understanding, and awareness of the concepts and content I taught them or was I merely comparing the quality of each project to another?
|M.I.A.: World War II|
|M.I.A.: Pythagorean Theorem|
The students would evaluate the project by responding to the following question:
- What academic standards and performance objectives does the project address?
- What essential or driving questions does the project answer?
- What did you learn about the concept and content we have addressed in this unit from the project?
|M.I.A.: Animals and Plants|
Once the students turned in the responses, the student or students who developed the project and I would go over the responses. If a percentage of the class were able to clearly recognize what standards and questions the project addressed and explain what deeper insight the project provided them, then that percentage was averaged into the grade I gave the student for their documentation of their research and process in developing the project.
Not only did it have the students feel as if they were involved in the decision-making of the class, it allowed me to determine just how deeply did the students understand the concepts and content I was teaching them. If they could recognize, understand, and determine how these projects addressed the performance objectives and essential questions of the unit, then I knew they "got it".
|M.I.A.: Science Fiction|
As you can see from the M.I.A. activities I listed, the projects were pretty spectacular. However, what made them substantial was the requirement for the documentation of the research and thinking behind the development of the project and also providing my students the choice and opportunity regarding how they would develop their projects. I have some great artifacts from these lessons that I not only used as exemplar text in my classroom but also in my professional development trainings. It's also nice to take the projects out from time and time and reflect upon how much these students enjoyed doing these projects. Many of them even progressed to turn their experiences into a career, becoming engineers, artists, athletes, and performers.
This is how we can make project-based learning a more substantial experience not only for our students but us teachers and not have it become as spectacularly empty as a Transformers movie.